Taguchi Design Overview
overview
     see also  

Dr. Genichi Taguchi is regarded as the foremost proponent of robust parameter design, which is an engineering method for product or process design that focuses on minimizing variation and/or sensitivity to noise. When used properly, Taguchi designs provide a powerful and efficient method for designing products that operate consistently and optimally over a variety of conditions.

In robust parameter design, the primary goal is to find factor settings that minimize response variation, while adjusting (or keeping) the process on target. After you determine which factors affect variation, you can try to find settings for controllable factors that will either reduce the variation, make the product insensitive to changes in uncontrollable (noise) factors, or both. A process designed with this goal will produce more consistent output. A product designed with this goal will deliver more consistent performance regardless of the environment in which it is used.

Engineering knowledge should guide the selection of factors and responses [3]. Robust parameter design is particularly suited for energy transfer processes; for example, a car's steering wheel is designed to transfer energy from the steering wheel to the wheels of the car. You should also scale control factors and responses so that interactions are unlikely. When interactions among control factors are likely or not well understood, you should choose a design that is capable of estimating those interactions. Minitab can help you select a Taguchi design that does not confound interactions of interest with each other or with main effects.

Noise factors for the outer array should also be carefully selected and may require preliminary experimentation. The noise levels selected should reflect the range of conditions under which the response variable should remain robust.

Robust parameter design uses Taguchi designs (orthogonal arrays), which allow you to analyze many factors with few runs. Taguchi designs are balanced, that is, no factor is weighted more or less in an experiment, thus allowing factors to be analyzed independently of each other.

Minitab provides both static and dynamic response experiments.

·    In a static response experiment, the quality characteristic of interest has a fixed level.

·    In a dynamic response experiment, the quality characteristic operates over a range of values and the goal is to improve the relationship between an input signal and an output response.

An example of a dynamic response experiment is an automotive acceleration experiment where the input signal is the amount of pressure on the gas pedal and the output response is vehicle speed. You can create a dynamic response experiment by adding a signal factor to a design - see Creating a dynamic response experiment.

The goal of robust experimentation is to find an optimal combination of control factor settings that achieve robustness against (insensitivity to) noise factors. Minitab calculates response tables, linear model results, and generates main effects and interaction plots for:

·    signal-to-noise ratios (S/N ratios, which provide a measure of robustness) vs. the control factors

·    means (static design) or slopes (dynamic design) vs. the control factors

·    standard deviations vs. the control factors

·    natural log of the standard deviations vs. the control factors

Use the results and plots to determine what factors and interactions are important and evaluate how they affect responses. To get a complete understanding of factor effects it is advisable to evaluate S/N ratios, means (static design), slopes (dynamic design), and standard deviations. Make sure that you choose an S/N ratio that is appropriate for the type of data you have and your goal for optimizing the response - see Choosing a signal-to-noise ratio for static designs.

Note 

If you suspect curvature in your model, select a design - such as 3-level designs - that allows you to detect curvature in the response surface.