Minitab offers several commands to help you determine how much of your process variation arises from variation in your measurement system.
A good starting point is Type 1 Gage Study, which evaluates the capability of the measurement system. This study evaluates the effects of bias and repeatability using multiple measurements from a single part, and is conducted prior to the Gage R&R (Expanded), Gage R&R (Crossed) and Gage R&R (Nested) studies, which help to recognize any deficiencies in your measurement system. To help set up your worksheet for the Gage R&R (Crossed) or (Nested) studies, use Create Gage R&R Study Worksheet.
Other commands are:
Note |
Attribute Agreement Analysis was previously called Attribute Gage R&R Study in Minitab Release 13. Attribute Agreement Analysis, a technique to assess appraisers' agreement, is different from Attribute Gage Study (Analytic Method), a method to examine the bias and repeatability of an attribute measurement system. |
Any time you measure the results of a process you will see variation. This variation comes from two sources: differences between parts made by the process and imperfections in taking measurements. Thus, measuring the same part repeatedly does not result in identical measurements.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is concerned with identifying sources of part-to-part variation, and reducing that variation as much as possible to get a more consistent product. But before you conduct any SPC analyses, you may want to check that the variation you observe is not mostly due to errors in your measurement system.
Measurement system errors can be classified into two categories: accuracy and precision.
Within any measurement system, you can have one or both of these problems. For example, you can have a device that measures parts precisely (little variation in the measurements) but not accurately. You can also have a device that is accurate (the average of the measurements is very close to the accurate value), but not precise, that is, the measurements have large variance. You can also have a device that is neither accurate nor precise.
accurate and precise |
precise but not accurate |
accurate but not precise |
not accurate or precise |
The accuracy of a measurement system is usually broken into three components:
To examine your measurement system's accuracy, see Gage Linearity and Bias Study.
Precision, or measurement variation, can be broken down into two components:
To look at your measurement system's precision, see Gage R&R (Expanded), Gage R&R (Crossed) or Gage R&R (Nested).
To look at a plot of all of the measurements by operator/part combination, and thus visualize the repeatability and reproducibility components of the measurement variation, see Gage Run Chart.
To look at both the bias and repeatability in an attribute measurement system, see Attribute Gage Study (Analytic Method).